Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nicholaus's avatar

This is really good. Wow. Your framework covers a lot of what I've been going over in therapy, actually.

I'm curious what your thoughts are on the limitations of perception and interpretation (and thereby of communication and "contact" as you call it). I find myself mourning the fact that there are asymptotic bounds to familiarity and intimacy- a consequence of the informational scarcity created by embodiment, as you describe it. Existential loneliness is a well-established cliché, so I know I'm not unique in this feeling. Do you think this loneliness arises from Ontological PSC? And from the ensuing intellectual obsession with the limitations of communication without being able to experience connection in the moment?

Chaddrick𝕵𝖆𝖍𝖆𝖆's avatar

This is a remarkably well put together framework. the parallels between it and “my framework” are striking although arrived at in a different register it seems we land in much of the same territory. Your PSC maps closely to what I’ve explored as the “primary cut”— the moment thought divides experience into subject and object, creating the sense of a separate “I” where there is none. your description of the authority transfer granting the modeled external perception more authority than direct experience is something I’ve written about extensively, some of which you can find in one of my recent pieces “Authority and its roots”. It goes into how we hand over our sovereign sense of inner knowing to doctrine, culture and inherited identities.

“Awareness is the field. Eternal. undifferentiated.” Precisely. Not “my awareness” or “your awareness” as such. I could go on with the parallels. Especially your frame of death topology as I also hold that what dies was never the essential. Identity, performance narrative. These all dissolves, but the actual knows no death.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?